> To me the research around solving “hallucination” is a dead end. The models will always hallucinate, and merely reducing the probability that they do so only

> To me the research around solving “hallucination” is a dead end. The models will always hallucinate, and merely reducing the probability that they do so only makes the mistakes more dangerous. A more interesting pursuit might be to determine if humans are "hallucinating" in this same way, if only occasionally. Have you ever known one of those pathological liars who lie constantly and about trivial or inconsequential details? Maybe the words they speak are coming straight out of some organic LLM-like faculty. We're all surrounded by p-zombies. All eight of us.