4 ms·
Yes but if you don't want to retard higher rpm in the motor gives higher losses. I think it is accurate enough to think of each revolution as a fixed cost for
by rightbyte 2y ago
Yes but if you don't want to retard higher rpm in the motor gives higher losses.
I think it is accurate enough to think of each revolution as a fixed cost for 'low' or idle power.
At idle power the motor should probably only be engaged when also braking.
- serf 2y ago>At idle power the motor should probably only be engaged when also braking. a cars' stability is aided by engine braking; if that isn't there it must be accommodated by knowledge of such a fact by the ABS/TCS/VCS systems, or a skilled driver that is expecting it. A regular car that expects engine braking, thrown into neutral and coasting down the highway is a more fragile handling and car-dynamics situation without these precautions. The Mercedes Glide Mode accommodates this by using the ABS/TCS systems to keep the weight where it needs to be regardless of applied engine torque one way or another; the driver does not experience a differently handling car.
- rightbyte 2y agoThat seems strange. I guess the "apply motor torque to speed up wheel" dynamic stability control would be slower to apply torque when in neutral, when control has been lost? Or is there some effect in the rubber from engine braking that make the front wheel more "prepared"?