Because most judges ruled them as abuse of the court, or having no legal standing, or being malpractice. I guess you can call those technicalities, but more ac

Because most judges ruled them as abuse of the court, or having no legal standing, or being malpractice. I guess you can call those technicalities, but more accurately they were trying to use the court system to wage politics and the courts both liberal and conservative all looked at what was filed and said they were absurd and baseless. I'm not going to put any links here to avoid steering too far into politics, but I'd recommend looking up the comments many judges made about those "cases" and the lawyers presenting them.