3 ms·
I think you can see here: https://www.votewatch.eu/cx_vote_details.php?id_act=1189&euro_vot_valoare=&euro_vot_rol_euro_grup=&euro_vot_rol_euro_tara=&vers=2&orde
by sspiff 14y ago
I think you can see here: https://www.votewatch.eu/cx_vote_details.php?id_act=1189&euro_vot_valoare=&euro_vot_rol_euro_grup=&euro_vot_rol_euro_tara=&vers=2&order_by=euro_parlamentar_nume&order=ASC&last_order_by=euro_parlamentar_nume&limit=0&offset=0&nextorder=ASC&euro_tara_id=&euro_grup_id=&euro_vot_valoare=%2B&euro_vot_rol_euro_grup= https://www.votewatch.eu/cx_vote_details.php?id_act=1189&...
- obtu 14y agoNope, 2010. This was a sane resolution, authored by the Greens and other center-left parties, asking for more transparency and putting some limits and sanity checks on the contents of the treaty, and it didn't pass: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=P7-RC-2010-0617&language=EN http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION... I think the parliament did end up voting a similar resolution though. Here's one earlier resolution that did pass, strictly about the lack of democracy and not the content of the treaty: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=P7-RC-2010-0154&language=EN http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION... There are a few more, but it's confusing because sometimes the votes are only on some paragraphs of the resolution. The paragraphs aren't easily cross-referenced, and I don't know if this kind of vote is final.