3 ms·
You're proving GP's point about normalization of progress. It's been two years. We're still during the first iteration of applications of this new tech, advance
by TeMPOraL 2y ago
You're proving GP's point about normalization of progress. It's been two years. We're still during the first iteration of applications of this new tech, advancements didn't have time yet to start compounding. This is barely getting started.
- KingMob 2y agoNeither of your points are proven. Is the slowdown a real effect of hitting technological/technique/data limits? Or is it just a lull in the storm?