>Ad peddling, stealing and selling personal information, that has been detrimental. So we agree on this part. > What did happen is that regulation was passed

>Ad peddling, stealing and selling personal information, that has been detrimental. So we agree on this part. > What did happen is that regulation was passed to allow 13 year olds to participate online much to the detriment of our society. My claim is that if "we" hadn't allowed 13 year olds to sign away liabilities when they registered on a website there would be fewer minors using social media in environments that are mixed with adults; more specifically guardians of minors would be required to decide if their kids should have access and in doing so would provide the correct market feedback to ensure that sites of great value to minors (education resources being top of mind for me) would receive more market demand and at the same time social platforms would have less impact on children as there would be fewer kids participating in anti-nurturing environments.