4 ms·
> The good software developers are still the good software developers Correct. Because they know they need to use the correct tools for the job. > If the tool
by cynicalpeace 2y ago
> The good software developers are still the good software developers
Correct. Because they know they need to use the correct tools for the job.
> If the tool really lives up to its hype then the non-adopters will fall behind
This is already happening. I'm able to out-deploy many of my competitors because I'm using Cursor.
Have you actually spent much time with Cursor? The comparison to "Jump to definition" is pretty bad. You also misspelled its name twice.
- zkry 2y agoOh yeah, typo, I work with the Cursive IDE a lot. I've spent a good amount of time with Cursor. And I have no doubt that it provides a lot of utility. I also would agree that most good devs I know definitely adopt some form of LLM integration. I would even agree that a lot of cursive features will bleed into other editors, maybe being considered a necessity. I just haven't made the observation that most people have switched to Cursor full-time and I also haven't noticed that those who have are on another level compared to those using their other editor plus chatgpt/copilot/etc.
- cynicalpeace 2y ago> I just haven't made the observation that most people have switched to Cursor full-time I noted that same thing in my initial comment.
- halfmatthalfcat 2y ago> I'm able to out-deploy This is a very poor metric for your efficacy as a software engineer and if you optimize for this, you're gonna have a bad time long term.
- cynicalpeace 2y agoYou're right. MRR is a better metric. Gotten great MRR via Cursor too.
- yladiz 2y agoHow’s your ARR?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]