3 ms·
> And we saw what happened with Windows division under Ballmer - it was profitable but it had no future. Microsoft under Ballmer was insanely profitable, more
by RandomThoughts3 2y ago
> And we saw what happened with Windows division under Ballmer - it was profitable but it had no future.
Microsoft under Ballmer was insanely profitable, more than its competitors and far more than before he took the helm. And despite that Ballmer launched Azure, started the push towards Entreprise software and at no point stopped investing.
I don’t think Ballmer was the best CEO ever but his poor reputation is very much undeserved.
- chucke1992 2y ago> Microsoft under Ballmer was insanely profitable, more than its competitors and far more than before he took the helm. Yeah, that's the thing - he was a good CFO. He was able to maximize profit and stuff. But people remember CEOs by their achievements - "a founder", "made MSFT into top three world companies"...With Ballmer people remember the lost decade and that's it.