2 ms·
I think the problem is that it's not anywhere close to 99.99% -- I might be wrong but my understanding is that it's closer to 70%. So even if you can predict wi
by achierius 2y ago
I think the problem is that it's not anywhere close to 99.99% -- I might be wrong but my understanding is that it's closer to 70%. So even if you can predict with perfect accuracy the cases that it gets wrong, you would still only cut down the validation cost by less than one OoM.
- crackalamoo 2y agoI'm not exactly sure how you would define 99.99% or 70% correct for protein folding, but AlphaFold is extremely accurate. The original AlphaFold paper had an rmsd of 0.96 Å at 95% residue coverage, which is less than the diameter of a carbon atom (1.4 Å).