3 ms·
... From a pool of respondents who follow this internet personality. She acknowledges that only 10% of her followers identify as women and may respond different
by twirlip 2y ago
... From a pool of respondents who follow this internet personality. She acknowledges that only 10% of her followers identify as women and may respond differently than their cohorts.
- crowcroft 2y agoYea, this is how I interpret the results. 'Men who watch porn self-identify as "knowing what women like"'. Quite a different insight.
- robotresearcher 2y agoThe article compares men's predictions of women's preferences to women's stated preferences. They didn't ask men if they were good at predicting. How could this support your interpretation?
- crowcroft 2y agoI’m skeptical that people surveyed are being honest about their gender in the survey. Tbf though looking closer it does appear that there’s a similar result in the paid responses as well so I might be being far too cynical.
- wongarsu 2y agoHowever getting some paid responses and comparing them to the other respondents is surprisingly good methodology for a blog post. And I think it does show that while the results weren't identical they weren't wildly skewed either
- NavinF 2y agoThat is incorrect. She got the same results from both her followers and from spending $1057 on Positly surveying people who are not her followers. Sometimes people are right on the internet.