3 ms·

The original title of the article is: > NY Times Gets 230 Wrong Again; Misrepresenting History, Law, And The First Amendment

• mikestew 2y ago
  Four chars too long, though. And it's "Section 230", if you were not parsing the integer value in the title.
  • nickthegreek 2y ago
    They know, they are the one who submitted the article to HN. I believe they were posting the comment just to denote that they had to change it. The following preserves all info under the title limit: NYT Gets 230 Wrong Again; Misrepresenting History, Law, And The 1st Amendment > NY Times Gets 230 Wrong Again; Misrepresenting History, Law, And The First Amendment
    • mikestew 2y ago
      I get that. It was more directed at the dork that downvoted the comment, to let them know why OP might have elaborated.