> I'm puzzled by opinions like this I'm for testing. In practice I think there are many drawbacks though. Specifically, engraving implementation details, whic

> I'm puzzled by opinions like this I'm for testing. In practice I think there are many drawbacks though. Specifically, engraving implementation details, which makes changing code way harder. In the commercial projects where I worked, integration testing (by non programmers) are the one that I think added value. I myself spam unit tests when I code like I want. It is not that. > experienced developers can indeed point out "code smells" that are worth discussing at the very least Ye I agree. I am not really sure what I am getting at. I think I need some sort of 'dogmatic wisdom is unwise' aphorism. Many newbies seem to take aphorisms way too litteraly. But maybe we would be even worse of without them?