3 ms·
TLDR: I thought it would be for sites that are heavy on charts, searches, or other forms of data analysis, but it isn't. Clance also is planning on moving to Po
by gwbas1c 2y ago
TLDR: I thought it would be for sites that are heavy on charts, searches, or other forms of data analysis, but it isn't. Clance also is planning on moving to Postgres.
----
I don't really "get" this. A lot of the comments here are focused on SQLite, but the page clearly says:
> Clace currently runs on a single node. When multi-node support is added later, the plan is to use a shared Postgres database instead of using local SQLite for metadata and file data storage.
Let's start with some basics:
1: What problem is Clance trying to solve? (IE, did the authors encounter problems hosting / generating static sites, and Clance is designed to solve a specific problem they had?)
2: Why can't Clance be multi-node today? (What potential problems would happen if I had multiple Clance nodes pointed to the same database, or github repo?)
Naively, I thought Clance wasn't serving truly static sites; IE, I thought Clance would be serving sites that allow querying static / infrequently changing data. I thought it would be for sites that are heavy on charts, searches, or other forms of data analysis.