> who think the best way to realize that potential is to build for-profit businesses that enable a creative-class petit bourgeois to make it through their day w

> who think the best way to realize that potential is to build for-profit businesses that enable a creative-class petit bourgeois to make it through their day without acknowledging another human being What does this even mean? This is just a word salad. > We think we can do better, by building tools that focus on fair dealing and sustainable growth rather than market dominance Apparently not. Marxists[1] need to realise that profit is not a dirty word, and growth is not a dirty word. Otherwise, you get things that are generally not economically sustainable, like this. The website was funded by an anonymous rich person... [1] I'm using this literally here, not as a pejorative.