3 ms·
It's intentionally misleading. I have never understood what this is supposed to accomplish, since it's greenwashing at it's worst and will damage the battery s
by phil21 2y ago
It's intentionally misleading. I have never understood what this is supposed to accomplish, since it's greenwashing at it's worst and will damage the battery storage (much less solar power in general) cause far more than it helps in the long term. It's utterly rampant in the renewable power space.
Eventually you run out of other people's power generation and these little wordplay tricks no longer work.
Follow the money, I suppose.
- s1artibartfast 2y agoMy take it is an attack tactic to convince the public that alternatives are not necessary, or the challenges don't exist. It serves to get commitment and action from people, and when/if they figure out they have been duped, they have no choice but to double down.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- tim333 2y agoThe source for this stuff is the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). I guess politics so it looks like they are doing something? wikipedia: >The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) is a principal agency of the U.S. Federal Statistical System responsible for collecting, analyzing, and disseminating energy information to promote sound policymaking I think they could be doing a better job in the above. (source article https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=63025&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=EIAsocial&utm_id=Amplification https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=63025&utm_so...)