> The largest instance(s) can still moderate maliciously, while the rest are insignificant. I've always thought this is an inherent problem for all decentraliz

> The largest instance(s) can still moderate maliciously, while the rest are insignificant. I've always thought this is an inherent problem for all decentralized solutions. If one node or server or whatever it gets called grows big enough, it stops being decentralized. If one (or even a few) federated server in a decentralized system becomes big enough to be the one that everyone uses, them it's just centralization with extra steps and a lot of moralization and handwaving. Do decentralized/federated systems in general have a way of preventing this from happening?