I agree w/ the first part: this is distinctly Chopin and beautiful. Not sure why a critique of the NYT is needed; they wrote a great article and had a great pe

I agree w/ the first part: this is distinctly Chopin and beautiful. Not sure why a critique of the NYT is needed; they wrote a great article and had a great performer perform it. Other "cultural organizations" can do what they wish and will not be harmed by this article (and indeed, may be helped, due to the word getting out).