4 ms·
Pretty weird choice of TTS engines. None of them are anywhere near state of the art as far as open TTS system goes. XTTSv2 or the new F5-TTS would have been muc
by lelag 2y ago
Pretty weird choice of TTS engines. None of them are anywhere near state of the art as far as open TTS system goes. XTTSv2 or the new F5-TTS would have been much better choices.
- segmondy 2y agoYou can always update the code to use that. Meta releasing stuff on github is not trying to release the "bet" but to give a proof of concept. The licenses of those TTS system matters, it's not enough to be open. If this was a product for their users, they will definitely have better TTS.
- imjonse 2y agoFrom improvements needed on the page: "Speech Model experimentation: The TTS model is the limitation of how natural this will sound. This probably be improved with a better pipeline and with the help of someone more knowledgable-PRs are welcome! :)"
- hackernewds 2y agoThe "PRs are welcome" posture for a for-profit entity, that actively harms minds and pretending to be open source gives me the heebie-jeebies