4 ms·
The author does not specify whether the tested libraries contain native code, cq. c. This obscures how much improvement is possible.
by MeteorMarc 2y ago
The author does not specify whether the tested libraries contain native code, cq. c. This obscures how much improvement is possible.
- pjmlp 2y agoContrary to Python, .NET can do plenty on its JIT and AOT compilers, and low level features used to support C++/CLI on the runtime.
- neonsunset 2y agoAll tested libraries here are pure C#. You simply do not need "native" components* for tasks like these in C#, since JIT/ILC is more than capable at producing performant "native" code. * for all intents and purposes that's what C# compiles to under NAOT. Even with JIT there is no interpreter stage, CIL is always compiled to native code.