Ah, I realize now that out of 12 some sentences, you were responding to exactly just the first. The more salient, interesting and more important points I though

Ah, I realize now that out of 12 some sentences, you were responding to exactly just the first. The more salient, interesting and more important points I thought were the last 11 some sentences Yes, physcadelics and marijuana have different habit formation characteristics. Since nobody is talking about marijuana here, and it is a totally different chemical compound - I assumed you were not just giving a what-about'ism response. How about nicotine addiction? Opioids, sex, gambling, sugar, alcohol? The habit formation characteristics are different and seemingly irrelevant. What was your point to smuggle in that marijuana sometimes has its habit forming characteristics downplayed? Do you have any evidence for habit formation properties of physcedlics? There is evidence for marijuana addiction that I am aware of: studies, surveys, treatment center numbers. The chemical compounds are completely different though. Why therefore are we now talking about cannabis addiction?