And the author of the article has a long history of misrepresenting science and has direct financial incentive to push her specific view. https://www.thelancet

And the author of the article has a long history of misrepresenting science and has direct financial incentive to push her specific view. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(18)31886-5/fulltext https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6... The BMJ got in trouble for believing her and had to issue retractions because of it: https://www.theverge.com/2015/10/26/9616122/bmj-nina-teicholz-dietary-guidelines-correction-investigation https://www.theverge.com/2015/10/26/9616122/bmj-nina-teichol... There is no evidence that Nina Teicholz should be given the benefit of the doubt when it comes to her arguments and plenty of evidence that she should be treated with skepticism.