3 ms·
even better, he could offer an alternative that doesn't fall on its face based on existing observations.
by exe34 2y ago
even better, he could offer an alternative that doesn't fall on its face based on existing observations.
- haccount 2y agoMy contribution is that current theory falls on it its face based on existing observations. That stands on its own. That I don't provide a viable replacement is a refutation of absolutely nothing.
- exe34 2y agoI think we already know that - otherwise nobody would be trying to gather more observations with the hope of throwing up a clue as to what the solution would be. the current theories are favoured purely because they work in more cases than any alternatives. nobody is saying they are 100% correct. so I'm not sure your contribution is terribly novel.