3 ms·
I think the amount of useful websites that work without JS are on a steady decline. No one wants to invest into a 0.1% share, so if it works it's likely out of
by sureIy 2y ago
I think the amount of useful websites that work without JS are on a steady decline. No one wants to invest into a 0.1% share, so if it works it's likely out of chance. Even newspapers have a bunch of popups that expect JS to be closed, so you have to hope uBlock is already configured to remove it for you.
- buro9 2y agoHave you tried?
- kvdveer 2y agoI have. Most information-type websites (blogs, recipes, news) work fine. Many app-style websites (email, bug tracking, chat) don't work, or have very poor ux. Guess which of these two categories I spend most of my time on...
- checkyoursudo 2y agoBut it is trivial to allow js per website using ublock. My default is no-js, and if there is some website I really want to use that requires js, then I enable it. If I find myself using that website regularly, then I make the permission permanent. It is literally zero burden. I am not some no-js evangelist or javascript hater or anything, but a huge amount of the web really does work fine (sometimes better even!) without js enabled by default. I don't think it has to be strictly either-or.