"…the UK's nuclear submarine fleet used (or still uses?) the presence of a Radio 4 broadcast signal" I'm not privy to the accuracy of that but it makes sense g

"…the UK's nuclear submarine fleet used (or still uses?) the presence of a Radio 4 broadcast signal" I'm not privy to the accuracy of that but it makes sense given the low frequency. In my earlier post to this story, that comes under the umbrella of what I said about that there were strategic reasons for not shutting down the LW Service and governments having nanny goats for advisors. As well as tbese low frequencies being better to communicate with submarines—although frequencies ten times lower (~18kHz) are much better—they travel long distances and can be very reliable over their given service areas (the ionosphere being more predictable at these low frequencies). Other reasons are that LW would provide more reliable communications during emergencies such as a mass communication outage with say the internet and other comms services being out. This could happen during nuclear war with EMP destroying much of the electronic infrastructure, similarly a repeat of the 1859 Carrington Event would deviate most existing communications infrastructure. It's dead easy to radiation-harden a LF transmitter if it used only valves (it's halfway there now as its RF output stage already uses valves).