4 ms·
Here's what their server stack looks like: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_servers https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_servers Lot of replicati
by hayleox 2y ago
Here's what their server stack looks like: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_servers https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_servers
Lot of replication and caching in there. For every cache there has to be a solution for how we're gonna make sure India doesn't receive the cached version, or receives a different cached version than the rest of the world. You also need to be sure that none of your changes are going to cause any significant reliability or performance issues. If you wanted to block India from accessing the entire site you could just cut them off at the top of the diagram, but blocking just one article means you have to get a lot more in the weeds.
Could they have hacked something together in 36 hours? Maybe. But the risk of causing larger reliability issues, or of having the forbidden article still partially accessible in India, would not be worth it.
- moralestapia 2y ago>"you don't understand the scale of wikipedia" or some bs
- hayleox 2y agoYeah, I saw. I was just explaining that it's not just some BS; there are very good reasons why they couldn't put together a well-tested reliable solution with a 36-hour deadline.