2 ms·
it's much much faster than the other alternatives tho. and staying with JPEG isn't really ideal with it's low quality and limited options going forward.
by SG- 2y ago
it's much much faster than the other alternatives tho. and staying with JPEG isn't really ideal with it's low quality and limited options going forward.
- doublepg23 2y agodoesn't mozjpeg get parity with WebP? https://siipo.la/blog/is-webp-really-better-than-jpeg https://siipo.la/blog/is-webp-really-better-than-jpeg
- lonjil 2y agoNot for a long time. The WebP encoder has improved a lot since MozJPEG was released. But these days we have Jpegli [1] which beats WebP at higher quality levels. [1] https://github.com/google/jpegli/ https://github.com/google/jpegli/