3 ms·

I flip between ChatGPT4o, Claude, Gemini (and its offsets NotebookLM and AIStudio). They all have their niches for example Claude projects (+ 3rd party claudesy

by tmpz22 2y ago

I flip between ChatGPT4o, Claude, Gemini (and its offsets NotebookLM and AIStudio). They all have their niches for example Claude projects (+ 3rd party claudesync) is useful for generating code for an Xcode project, or AIStudio can handle more file formats including video. Then there's different context sizing, Gemini being the biggest I'm aware of. I'm really unimpressed by the velocity of feature development from these AI orgs, I don't expect them to have complete feature parity any time soon if at all. As always pick the right tool for the job. There is almost never a 1-size fits all best selection.

manishsharan 2y ago
I have found Gemini pro to be excellent for RAG application. Most of my java projects with less than 500k lines of code can fit entirely in its context window so I don't have to mess with chunking. Before this came along, we had tried different tools and RAG applications and nothing compares to what Gemeni delivers. And the cost is nearly nothing compared to gains.
nashadelic 2y ago
> I'm really unimpressed by the velocity of feature development from these AI orgs, I don't expect them to have complete feature parity any time soon if at all. I feel two ways about this: one is that there's a lot of opportunity for fast moving startups. But two: how does a startup remain defensible with the giant comes along? The example is copilot: Microsoft announced it 19 months ago and still very rough around the edges and many opensource projects are doing a fairly decent job of filling in the gap in the meanwhile.
- tmpz22 2y ago
  Are fast moving startups the best vehicle for rapid software development in 2024?
gexla 2y ago
There's a huge difference between Gemini and Gemini Pro. > I'm really unimpressed by the velocity of feature development from these AI orgs Seems about right though. Do they even know what to build? I get the sense that they are getting an idea started and then moving mostly based on feedback. We're still very early in this game.
- GoToRO 2y ago
  This is what I wanted to know. Unfortunately, they don't allow you to preview the pro for free and it's hard to pay for something that you have no idea if it's good.

by tmpz22 2y ago

manishsharan 2y ago

I have found Gemini pro to be excellent for RAG application. Most of my java projects with less than 500k lines of code can fit entirely in its context window so I don't have to mess with chunking. Before this came along, we had tried different tools and RAG applications and nothing compares to what Gemeni delivers. And the cost is nearly nothing compared to gains.

nashadelic 2y ago

> I'm really unimpressed by the velocity of feature development from these AI orgs, I don't expect them to have complete feature parity any time soon if at all. I feel two ways about this: one is that there's a lot of opportunity for fast moving startups. But two: how does a startup remain defensible with the giant comes along? The example is copilot: Microsoft announced it 19 months ago and still very rough around the edges and many opensource projects are doing a fairly decent job of filling in the gap in the meanwhile.

tmpz22 2y ago
Are fast moving startups the best vehicle for rapid software development in 2024?

gexla 2y ago

There's a huge difference between Gemini and Gemini Pro. > I'm really unimpressed by the velocity of feature development from these AI orgs Seems about right though. Do they even know what to build? I get the sense that they are getting an idea started and then moving mostly based on feedback. We're still very early in this game.

GoToRO 2y ago
This is what I wanted to know. Unfortunately, they don't allow you to preview the pro for free and it's hard to pay for something that you have no idea if it's good.