2 ms·
It’s both. Most manual tests are required to be run whenever the underlying code has changed. And that’s pretty slow and annoying. Interpreting results is usual
by nashadelic 2y ago
It’s both. Most manual tests are required to be run whenever the underlying code has changed. And that’s pretty slow and annoying. Interpreting results is usually pretty trivial, like checking the http code or checking against an assert. I don’t think most companies use/should use manual testing but where it’s unavoidable, this is a great workaround.