4 ms·
Interesting. I did assess the ES6 coverage of ~97% a month ago. I just evaluated that while it sounds high, 3% of people is a lot of people to cut off if your
by sshine 2y ago
Interesting.
I did assess the ES6 coverage of ~97% a month ago.
I just evaluated that while it sounds high, 3% of people is a lot of people to cut off if your JavaScript is essential.
E.g. Firefox sits at ~2.7% browser market share. (Not incidentally the part that doesn't support ES6, but it's a demography the size of my own.)
- Our_Benefactors 2y ago> 3% of people is a lot of people to cut off if your JavaScript is essential These are probably the 3% that won’t affect your business much. They’re more likely to be on older hardware and also have less discretionary income. Or browsing on really weird hardware that is also unlikely to lead to a sale.
- saghm 2y agoPeople with "less discretionary income" still deserve to access the web in a way that isn't broken. This might come as a surprise nowadays, but the web can be useful for more than just selling things.
- jazzypants 2y agoI have a $30 cell phone that runs the latest version of Chrome.
- saghm 2y agoI'm just responding to the premise of the parent comment; I don't have any strong sense one way or another whether it's accurate or not.
- jazzypants 2y agoI always assumed it was people browsing on work computers that they don't control.