3 ms·
The entire body of technological progress stands as a counter-argument to “if it was possible someone would be doing it”. Things are only impossible until they
by mulmen 2y ago
The entire body of technological progress stands as a counter-argument to “if it was possible someone would be doing it”. Things are only impossible until they aren’t.
- hn_throwaway_99 2y agoAnd the "until the aren't" part importantly involves a feasible plan to actually get there. This article is just an art project. There are tons of easily identified questions that would need to be answered to make a project like this feasible. The author conveniently answers none of them because it would show how unrealistic this whole thing would be.
- mulmen 2y agoYou're responding to an argument I didn't make. The lack of an economically feasible implementation today does not prove that one will never exist.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- dsign 2y ago>> involves a feasible plan to actually get there. Most plans never realize exactly--they have budget and time overruns--, and that happens in both infrastructure and software development. So, they are not feasible to start with. On that principle, you can shoot down any and all plans, and never should anybody do anything.