4 ms·

I fundamentally disagree with your comment on "exploiting workers." That's what Marx thought, and it's precisely where he went wrong.

• latexr 2y ago
  > I fundamentally disagree with your comment on "exploiting workers." The workers themselves and Amnesty International call it exploitation. https://www.forbes.com/sites/katherinehamilton/2023/05/24/delivery-drivers-sue-amazon-for-being-forced-to-pee-in-bottles/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/katherinehamilton/2023/05/24/de... https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/10/saudi-arabia-migrants-workers-who-toiled-in-amazon-warehouses-were-deceived-and-exploited/ https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/10/saudi-arabia-... Either way, that’s not what matters despite you deciding to focus on it. The main point is that “Bezos is a multibillionaire, his problems are not our problems”. > That's what Marx thought, and it's precisely where he went wrong. This too, is nonsensical and irrelevant. Marx had exactly zero commentary on Amazon practices, because he died in the nineteenth century.