3 ms·
It matters because software projects are border-agnostic. There are people who benefit from code, and people who benefit from having people contribute to code.
by instagraham 2y ago
It matters because software projects are border-agnostic. There are people who benefit from code, and people who benefit from having people contribute to code.
You drew the line on who gets to be a part of this, Geopoliticising something ostensibly unpolitical. If you want a rule of law in code, you’ll need more than a framework that only punishes Russia. Otherwise it’s no longer open source, it’s America-source.
For what it’s worth I’d favour a host of military and economic measures against Russia. I think the only way this war stops is with military aid, maybe even intervention. I’m not here to defend Russia. I just don’t see what you expect Russians to do by nuking them from a Linux maintainer list.
It’s a net loss for all of us to keep their coders out of open source. If we’re gonna do that with a logic that somehow spares America but punishes everyone else, then we just create a precedent that makes the whole ecosystem worse for a lot of people with nothing to do with this.
- krisoft 2y ago> I just don’t see what you expect Russians to do by nuking them from a Linux maintainer list. Finding alternative employment with a non-sactioned company would be a start.
- instagraham 2y agoi agree that's not an unreasonable ask. but if code is to serve geopolitics, then we'll get a lot more (and tougher) situations like this to grapple with. perhaps it's just that I wish code was left neutral.
- mardifoufs 2y agoI think you're under the false impression that the removals were aimed at specific contributors from specific corporations. Which isn't the case by the way.