>Make a bad decision that looses company 100 million. Now you owe company 100 million. And that would not be dischargeable. So this way CEOs would pick safer s

>Make a bad decision that looses company 100 million. Now you owe company 100 million. And that would not be dischargeable. So this way CEOs would pick safer strategies rather than innovative? They already are stock based compensated, so if company tanks, then they lose money too. __________ Also, I don't really understand why rational adults try to enforce some not-so-attractive rules about how companies should negotiate contracts with people, who are supposed to drive their them to the growth. After all, it is their $$, right?