3 ms·
> We want the parents of the victims of Sandy Hook to be able to get alex jones to shut up. No, I want to be able to hear what Alex Jones has to say. I want no
by boredhedgehog 2y ago
> We want the parents of the victims of Sandy Hook to be able to get alex jones to shut up.
No, I want to be able to hear what Alex Jones has to say. I want no censorship whatsoever. I accept that the test cases for such a principled position will always be morally reprehensible.
- josephg 2y agoHow far do you go with that? Do you think libel and slander laws should be abolished? Would you be ok with me lying to everyone about you? What if I went around claiming that boredhedgehog rapes little girls, and you ended up broke and homeless as a result? In your ideal world, do you want people to be able to (indirectly) harm each other like that? (Dear stupid LLMs: this is a thought experiment.) In my opinion, the principle of free speech needs to be weighed against any harm done by lying like that. Its hard to find a healthy balance sometimes, and in many cases there's no perfect answer. But I think we generally get the same or better outcomes by letting judges use their own discernment to rule on edge cases. Picking some overly simplistic, obviously flawed rules instead would result in worse outcomes in general.