2 ms·

I am (or was, at this point) a cryptographer. Throwing random cryptography buzzwords at a problem does not magically create a secure solution. Even if you had

I am (or was, at this point) a cryptographer. Throwing random cryptography buzzwords at a problem does not magically create a secure solution. Even if you had a genie to give you all of this, you’d absolutely want to include and build upon the work Apple is doing here.

Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
>Throwing random cryptography buzzwords at a problem does not magically create a secure solution. no but any more words between those naughty ones and im pushing my quota Diffie Hellman, TIFU, handshake, auth between two+ parties Homomorphic encryption, zero knowledge proofs, Doesnt publicly exist in a useful manner; any implementations likely will be ITAR'd or NIST'd moled. allows verifiable, but anonymous computation, trust-less computing, decentralized triple (sender, messenger, receiver) layered protocol. like tor/i2p/other "pony express" decentralized trustless transport protocols - pass on what you cannot decrypt. Faraday caged, deafened power supply, Heartbeat/pulse sensors, proximity sensors, voltage sensors, EM/radio triggers, dead-man switch, all reporting with constantly rotating codes. ^forgot to add bluetooth / orientation / volume kill-switches for physical security. >Even if you had a genie to give you all of this, lets not joke the culture, they are the best at math >you’d absolutely want to include and build upon the work Apple is doing here. ive described a modern da vinci codex and you think itd be better in a safe to be reverse-engineered.