3 ms·
Good? Do you understand the ecosystems and national parks that would be destroyed by this? Once those are gone they are gone. We don’t even need this nonsens
by Mistletoe 2y ago
Good? Do you understand the ecosystems and national parks that would be destroyed by this? Once those are gone they are gone. We don’t even need this nonsense, the population is contracting. We will have nothing but empty space in inhabited spaces already.
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/59899 https://www.cbo.gov/publication/59899
- jamiek88 2y agoArticle talks about how 90% of the land would remain as is as well as 100% of the national parks, simply restoring watersheds that are intermittent or dried up to wetlands. I didn't use the word good anywhere or even offer a value judgement, I simply called it interesting. Also your tone sucks and makes me not want to discuss in good faith with you.
- moribvndvs 2y ago“what the hell does my tone got to do with it?[0]” 0 - https://youtu.be/Rv71ZCd_yno?feature=shared https://youtu.be/Rv71ZCd_yno?feature=shared
- TinkersW 2y agoArticle assumes people want to live in cramped cities.. clearly this is not the case when we look at where Americans choose to live, so premise is flawed. In reality 300 more Americans would spread out and wreck the environment more than it already is.