3 ms·
Indeed it will be a useful definition, as this comment noted above: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41951573 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41951573
by SrslyJosh 2y ago
Indeed it will be a useful definition, as this comment noted above: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41951573 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41951573
- JumpCrisscross 2y agoSure. Again, there is a pedantic argument with zero broad merit. And there is a practical one. No group owns words; even trademarks fight an uphill battle. If you want to convince people to use your definition, you have to compromise and make it useful. Precisely-defined useless terminology is, by definition, useless; it’s efficient to replace that word, especially if in common use, with something practical.