3 ms·
I don’t understand why the “practical” reality requires using the phrase “open source” then. It’s not open source. That label is false and fraudulent if you can
by blackeyeblitzar 2y ago
I don’t understand why the “practical” reality requires using the phrase “open source” then. It’s not open source. That label is false and fraudulent if you can’t produce the same artifact or approximately the same artifact. The data is part of the source for models.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> don’t understand why the “practical” reality requires using the phrase “open source” then. It’s not open source. That label is false and fraudulent Natural languages are parsimonious; they reuse related words. In this case, the closest practical analogy to open-source software has the lower barrier to entry. Hence, it will win. There is no place for defining open source as data available. In software, too, this problem is solved by using “free software” for the extreme definition. The practical competition is between the Facebook model available with restrictions definition and this.