4 ms·
>Good, trustworthy governance. This example shows that you can't just shut off free speech to a few rogue nations, because states 'incompatible with liberal de
by 1shooner 2y ago
>Good, trustworthy governance.
This example shows that you can't just shut off free speech to a few rogue nations, because states 'incompatible with liberal democracy' include the majority of the world's population. As we see, they hold enough influence to assert their censorship on all of us, regardless of where we are.
What hypothetical 'trustworthy governance' would be less susceptible to India's influence than WMF is in this case?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- josephg 2y ago> they hold enough influence to assert their censorship on all of us, regardless of where we are. Maybe. I don't see any reason that an Indian court order would be enforced outside of India. I wouldn't be surprised if it was just be a technical limitation. Maybe wikipedia doesn't have an easy way to censor a page in just one jurisdiction and leave it up everywhere else.