> But framing this as though it has been editors going rogue or something is just not what’s happening at all. Of which I didn't do. Granted, 40 years is a lon

> But framing this as though it has been editors going rogue or something is just not what’s happening at all. Of which I didn't do. Granted, 40 years is a long time. But given that the company has had the policy of not endorsing for over two-thirds of its existence, I believe the "undo" framing is accurate.