4 ms·

From the Fox News Wikipedia article >Fox News has been characterized by many as a propaganda organization.[24][25][26][27][28] Its coverage has included biased

From the Fox News Wikipedia article >Fox News has been characterized by many as a propaganda organization.[24][25][26][27][28] Its coverage has included biased and false reporting in favor of the Republican Party, its politicians, and conservative causes,[29][30][31] while portraying the Democratic Party in a negative light. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fox_News https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fox_News Too lazy to check the others. The NYT undoubtedly has a lengthy section on the buildup to the Iraq War, where they would have been a "propaganda tool of the incumbent government."

kibwen 2y ago
> The NYT undoubtedly has a lengthy section on the buildup to the Iraq War, where they would have been a "propaganda tool of the incumbent government." This comment might come across as sarcastic, possibly implying that Wikipedia wouldn't cover such a thing. To be clear, Wikipedia has an entire article entitled "List of The New York Times controversies" (linked from the main article), which does indeed mention the Iraq War (among other things) in the summary, with a section to elaborate, linking to the article on Judith Miller for much more extensive elaboration. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_The_New_York_Times_controversies#Second_Iraq_War https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_The_New_York_Times_con... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Miller#The_Iraq_War https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Miller#The_Iraq_War