> We cannot deduce Bezos’ motives from Trump’s vengefulness. Why not? You personally can refrain from any speculation, if you wish, but it's nonetheless the m

> We cannot deduce Bezos’ motives from Trump’s vengefulness. Why not? You personally can refrain from any speculation, if you wish, but it's nonetheless the most obvious explanation. Moreover, your own speculation is implausible: > perhaps this is a return to more profitable and credible roots. This last-minute backpedaling makes The Washington Post look much worse than an endorsement. The new non-endorsement "policy" wasn't announced in advance. It came only after the editors had already drafted an endorsement of Harris, and at least one editor resigned as a result. The Post now appears less credible rather than more.