3 ms·
Absolute nonsense. It wasn't the Editorial Board's decision, it was her father's. He has publicly stated that he blocked the endorsement, and multiple members
by favorited 2y ago
Absolute nonsense. It wasn't the Editorial Board's decision, it was her father's. He has publicly stated that he blocked the endorsement, and multiple members of the Editorial Board have resigned in protest.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/oct/25/los-angeles-times-owner-blocks-harris-endorsement https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/oct/25/los-angeles-...
https://apnews.com/article/los-angeles-times-editors-resign-af6c077d502c9d4878bee01fa6575450 https://apnews.com/article/los-angeles-times-editors-resign-...
- themgt 2y agoThe point to me was the owner's daughter suggesting the genocide was their family's reason for not wanting to endorse.
- BobaFloutist 2y agoFunny that she tried launder it through the Editorial Board's "judgement," in that case.
- favorited 2y agoExactly. Soon-Shiong said he didn't want to "add to the division," and that he had asked the Editorial Board to "publish a list of positive and negative attributes about both of the presidential candidates." His daughter's claim that the decision was based on the candidates' support of Israel has no basis in any reporting. It's also just a bad lie, because her father and (now former) members of the Editorial Board have spoken publicly about their reasons.
- themgt 2y agoHere's the NYT report: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/26/us/los-angeles-times-endorsement-soon-shiong.html https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/26/us/los-angeles-times-endo...