3 ms·
I'd be incredibly surprised if there are even 100 people who: - Don't know who The Washington Post editorial board would endorse - Would change who they are v
by moduspol 2y ago
I'd be incredibly surprised if there are even 100 people who:
- Don't know who The Washington Post editorial board would endorse
- Would change who they are voting for based on this lack of endorsement
But I could be wrong.
- TylerE 2y agoWe’re in. Situation wheee one of the candidates routinely criticizes us and praises our enemies, and still pulls at about 42%. Rationality is not in evidence.
- bamboozled 2y agoIf this race is right, then whatever I thought about people was wrong. Then again, I always wonder what the hell actually went through peoples minds in Nazi Germany.
- lerjan 2y ago[flagged]
- traitfield 2y agoAfter more than 60 years the Reductio ad Hitlerium is finally losing its power, heartening to see.
- ThrowawayR2 2y agoThe reason is pretty damned simple: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It%27s_the_economy,_stupid https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It%27s_the_economy,_stupid Or, as Bertolt Brecht put it, "Erst kommt das Fressen, dann kommt die Moral." The Democrats used to understand this but now they don't and that's why they are struggling.
- dclowd9901 2y agoLooks like you’re getting a firsthand view now.
- bigstrat2003 2y ago[flagged]
- johnnyanmac 2y agoAll elections ultiamtely come down to undecided swing voters. It's silly every-time, but you need to vastly lower your expectations for that kind of crowd. Yes, a cheesy dance number endorsing a candidate can be all that is needed to swing an entire election. This is an issue with first past the post, but that's a much larger thing to tackle.