4 ms·
I agree, especially with the term "discoverers". I think a key part of what steers us towards the easy answer, and leads us away from thinking on our own is the
by cgordo840 2y ago
I agree, especially with the term "discoverers". I think a key part of what steers us towards the easy answer, and leads us away from thinking on our own is the fact that most questions do in fact have answers readily accessible online. The mystery is gone. The zest for learning & applying knowledge loses a little something when you believe there not much else to be gained on your own. So I agree, breaking new boundaries and making new discoveries is a vital part to maintaining high intelligence levels. But there we have a catch 22. Technology has progressed to the point that in order to consider new boundaries the knowledge required is enormous. This prerequisite severely limits access to these boundaries on a large scale. Only a small percent will have the means (financial, intellectual, ect) to acquire the knowledge necessary. This of course would lead to a larger perceived IQ divide among the masses.
- cgordo840 2y agoJust to see what kind of responses I can get.... If i were a crazy conspiracy theorist...what better way to control a population than to propagate a culture where thinking becomes the second best option? And our technological advances have raised the bar intellectually so high that the perceived divide is real as shown through declining IQ scores. And that divide is a means of societal separation, cultivated to allow aristocracy. But I'm just talking crazy.