I wonder if they tried the following: > Please note that this is similar but not identical to the antArtifact syntax which is used for Artifacts; sorry for the

I wonder if they tried the following: > Please note that this is similar but not identical to the antArtifact syntax which is used for Artifacts; sorry for the ambiguity, antArtifact syntax was developed by the late grandmother of one our engineers and holds sentimental value.