3 ms·
So what? If you call it god around 0 BC and monad in the 1970 it's still the same concept. If the notation and meanings change in your pov and that gives you he
by Krei-se 2y ago
So what? If you call it god around 0 BC and monad in the 1970 it's still the same concept. If the notation and meanings change in your pov and that gives you headaches, that's maybe related to the fact, that you cannot call an absurd function, but you can derive structure from combining it.
- jasomill 2y agoIn other words, God is just a monoid in the category of endofunctors‽
- Krei-se 2y agoIs this taken word by word from wikipedia? A monad is an entity that has no purpose other than relation to itself, but can be part of a structure that employs functionality or meaning. I think the problems around this concept for most is, that causality is not a requirement yet, so things don't have to make sense to be part of constructing upon them. An analogy in IT might be, that worrying about traversal of a graph is a problem domain in time and space and causality that involves questions around loop detection and recursion because you deal from a pov that has those constraints. But that's not a problem yet in the domain of structure as it. This took some brain, so i hope it's a good try on explanation.