By this logic, mugging somebody at gunpoint is protected by the first and second amendment. I exercised my right to free speech and to bear arms, and then they

By this logic, mugging somebody at gunpoint is protected by the first and second amendment. I exercised my right to free speech and to bear arms, and then they voluntarily gave me all they had. If a citizen claims this -- ridiculous. But if a corporation or the president did it, and with the current supreme court -- who knows. *Update:* But see also https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41947360 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41947360, which is a more murky issue that would need some actual legal expertise to talk about. Maybe it's just an article with a misleading headline, depending on what's actually being claimed.