And Rc<T> is a "confession" that we still need reference counting semantics. And macros are a "confession" that pure Rust code isn't powerful enough. And "unsaf

And Rc<T> is a "confession" that we still need reference counting semantics. And macros are a "confession" that pure Rust code isn't powerful enough. And "unsafe" is a "confession" that we really do need "unsafe". And so on and so forth with all kinds of features. Except that's a really harsh and unproductive way to phrase it. The existence of "unsafe" is not a "confession" that safe code is impossible so why should even try. Progress in safety is still made when an unsafe capability is removed from the normal, common, suggested way to do things and it is moved to something you need to ask for and take responsibility for, and hemmed in by other safe constructs around it.