3 ms·
Why will a defined benefit scheme “obviously” not happen?
by jen20 2y ago
Why will a defined benefit scheme “obviously” not happen?
- linotype 2y agoBecause defined benefit plans (at least in the US) are dead and have been for a while (10 years in the Boeing case).
- ImPostingOnHN 2y agoThank you for asking a good faith question. To answer, I've provided a couple of links below, but the tl;dr is that they're unaffordable for companies, and as a result have become an anachronism. Boeing specifically was already losing billions before the strike, so has a negative ability to give more, much less increase their 60+ billion dollar unfunded pension liabilities with new generations they'll have to keep paying for another half century. https://finbox.com/NYSE:BA/explorer/unfunded_vested_pension_liab/ https://finbox.com/NYSE:BA/explorer/unfunded_vested_pension_... https://www.barrons.com/articles/boeing-strike-pension-plan-restart-0d1b4adb https://www.barrons.com/articles/boeing-strike-pension-plan-... Notably, the question I asked before yours, was also in good faith. I answered yours first as a further show of good faith, but the question that now must be addressed is: What compromise has the union offered from their own initial demands?
- jen20 2y agoThanks for the links, that does indeed seem to support your assertion. I don't know enough about this dispute in general to offer opinion on what any party has or hasn't done though, so anything I have to say about the union representing Boeing workers would just be noise in the conversation.
- salawat 2y agoThe union had already compromised, and if Boeing has unfunded pension liabilities, why in the fuck were they doing stock buybacks? Unfunded pension liabilities = undelivered compensation for people who have already worked for you. What in the Sam is wrong with this bloody country man? Does anything actually bloody work?
- ImPostingOnHN 2y agoI know, I totally support Boeing selling their buyback'd stock, even if it tanks the stock price (executive compensation be damned), and using the proceeds to account for a portion of their unfunded pension liabilities. Even if they did that, though, I don't think it would cover their current pension liabilities, much less new ones which will continue to grow for decades.